If you assume that what I said about the dominant form of extension makes black and added on top of that makes bay, then I am basically saying that agouti is a modifier. Agouti modifies extension. Read that statement again: you will see the fault in it. If agouti is dominant, and is a modifier, then it would modify all extension, yet science dictates that that agouti only modifies dominant extension. In that case, it wouldn't be dominant. Somewhere, there is a breakdown that doesn't make sense.
Basically, erase everything I ever said about agouti being a modifier, and pay close attention: the order in which we mentally play out colors doesn't actually work the easy way.
The truth is that extension does not create black pigment; extension is present in horses that are not black. That being said, what extension does is it creates black and red pigment. The dominant form of extension creates black, but when paired with agouti what exactly happens is a bit mixed in people's minds.
Think of agouti as instructions: it instructs the black pigment where to go. Even in recessive form, they are still instructions. Agouti is still telling the black where to go.
So: DO NOT THINK OF EXTENSION AS THE BLACK GENE, AND DO NOT THINK OF AGOUTI AS THE BAY GENE. Because in truth, agouti makes both bay and black. Does that make sense? The absense (or recessive form) of agouti is actually what makes the horse solid black, and even if the horse was dominant for extension and agouti didn't exist, then maybe the horse wouldn't be black at all.
Agouti does not add or dilute red pigment to make a black horse. This is not particularly important in actually understanding how colors work, and if you read this to a beginner it may make no sense whatsoever. The basic 'extension makes black, and agouti makes bay' will work up to a point, but understanding that agouti does not modify 'what is already there' is nice to know at some point. And it is science, and trying to make it simpler than what it is is fine, but NOT simplifying it into something not true.
For further reading, go to http://equinetapestry.com/2014/09/bay-is-not-a-modifier/
No comments:
Post a Comment